|
A large group of bizarre
women circle round Tony Blair. They are not benign. They have no
understanding of normal relationships between men and women. Recently, a woman commentator
said Harman was a gender supremacist. Hock calls them “gender
racists”. Recently, I heard Harman
speak at a DV conference ( www.ivorcatt.com/2029.htm
). She is set to cause major damage to society. The attitude of these four women is appalling, and very destructive. Further, they have the power to destroy. Ivor Catt 25aug02 |
|
For Judith Jones, also see http://web.onetel.net.uk/~richardwebster/ |
|
2201 overflow Judith
Jones is new to me but not Jacqui Saradjian - she's also connected
with Bindle and 'women against rape' DV and that sort of thing RW The
review team was led by Dr Richard Barker, a social worker in an academic post
at the University of Northumbria; Roy Wardell, a former director of social
services for Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council; Jacqui Saradjian, a
clinical psychologist and Judith Jones, a senior social worker. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2160607.stm The
review, which delivered its report in November 1998, was a
"shambles" which denied the pair basic legal safeguards, Mr Justice
Eady said. "The 'accused' were not notified of exactly what was alleged
against them, or told what the evidence was, or given an opportunity of
testing it or responding." The
pair were assured that interviews with the children were untainted by leading
questions, when the team knew the contrary to be the case. The team then
"chose to promulgate to the council and to the wider public what was
recognised within days to be a specious and disreputable document. They must
have appreciated the harm they would do to the claimants and indeed the
physical risks to which they were choosing to subject them.
....... The judge made a "very rare" finding of malice
against the team. They had forfeited the protection of qualified privilege,
which usually protects reports produced in the public interest from libel
claims, because "they included in their report a number of fundamental
claims which they must have known to be untrue and which cannot be explained
on the basis of incompetence or mere carelessness". http://www.guardian.co.uk/Print/0,3858,4472728,00.html SocietyGuardian.co.uk staff Judith Jones is an
independent social worker, consultant and trainer in child protection. She
has been a social worker, senior manager, trainer and consultant to local
authorities and the voluntary sector, specialising in child protection work.
She qualified as a social worker in 1976, and has a masters degree in child
protection studies. Ms Jones is on the Law Society's expert witness register.
She is also a visiting research fellow at the child and women abuse studies
unit at the University of North London. http://www.guardian.co.uk/child/story/0,7369,766932,00.html Who's who: the inquiry team Judith Jones is an
independent social worker, consultant and trainer in child protection. She
has been a social worker, senior manager, trainer and consultant to local
authorities and the voluntary sector, specialising in child protection work.
She qualified as a social worker in 1976, and has a masters degree in child
protection studies. Ms Jones is on the Law Society's expert witness register.
She is also a visiting research fellow at the child and women abuse studies
unit at the University of North London. Professor Richard Barker is head
of the child and family studies at Northumbria University. A sociology
graduate, with a masters degree from Bradford University and a doctorate from
Edinburgh University, he trained as a teacher in Birmingham and as a social
worker in Leeds. He has worked for three local authorities in Yorkshire, and
has conducted research into a range of issues, including child protection and
children in care. Professor Barker founded and led a multi-professional,
post-qualifying child protection course, approved by social work and nursing
qualification boards. He has also acted as an independent chairman of child
protection conferences and reviews, and undertaken consultancy work and
training on child protection in the UK and throughout Europe. Roy Wardell, former
director of social services for the Metropolitan Borough of Barnsley, has 42
years experience in social services, with specialist knowledge of issues
affecting children and families. He has worked for several local authorities,
both internally and as an outside adviser. He was assistant director of
social services for Humberside county council, and was an adviser on social
services to the Association of Metropolitan Authorities until 1993. During
the same period, he was a member of the children and families' committee of
the Association of Directors of Social Services. Over the past nine years, Mr
Wardell has acted as independent chairman of two adoption panels and of
complaints review panels for 12 local authorities. Dr Camille San Lazaro, senior
lecturer in paediatric forensic medicine at the University of Newcastle upon
Tyne, was not a member of the inquiry team. However, she examined 53 children
in the case. Dr San Lazaro is a nationally-respected consultant paediatrician
and child protection expert with 30 years experience as a paediatrician,
published widely in the area of sexual abuse, and lecturing nationally and
internationally. A member of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child
Health, Dr Lazaro has been on the board of the northern training centre for
child protection studies, and the board of Northumbria University MA in child
protection studies. She was awarded an OBE for services to the care of
sexually abused children in the New Year's honours 1999. She advises the
children's charity NSPCC. But according to Mr Justice Eady, in his judgement
on the Shieldfield libel case on July 30 2002, Dr San Lazaro was
"unbalanced, obsessive and lacking in judgement". He said the
inquiry team "clearly fell under the spell" of Dr San Lazaro. @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Blair’s radfems in “business” David Miller, finance director of PFI favourites
Amey, resigned in August following the firm’s admission that its accounts
were wrong by £61m and that it had actually made an £18m pre-tax loss rather
than an anticipated profit. The reason for this “confusion” (sic) was that
company accounts are no longer allowed to treat the bidding costs for PFI
schemes – involving an army of lawyers and accountants – as an investment. All most embarrassing for Amey, of course, but no
less so for the egg-spattered trade and industry secretary Patricia Hewitt. Last November the DTI gave a £35m,
12-year contract to Amey, the company which now employs her old colleague Baroness Jay alongside
former Tory minister John Patten. In return Amey would run an “accounts
service” for the department, which “will encompass all aspects of financial
accounting and related systems support and will range from the management
staff claims and allowances to provision of Treasury functions and the
reporting of key business indicators”. In short the DTI is now run by a minister, Hewitt,
who previously worked for Anderson Consulting (erstwhile sister firm to
disgraced accountants Arthur Anderson [who as its auditors covered for Enron, the biggest m multi-billion dollar
scandal in history]) – and who in turn has privatised the ministry’s
financial accounting to a company which has been forced to restate its own
accounts to reflect more honestly its involvement in privatisation. Ain’t
life grandy and dandy! – Private Eye No.
1062, 6sep02, p3. [Is the radfem grievance that for centuries women
have been denied the opportunity to be corrupt on a larger scale? – Ivor Catt] x |