Header

 

For Ill Eagle in past years, go to www.ivorcatt.com/99.htm or to www.electromagnetism.demon.co.uk/1csetz.htm and www.electromagnetism.demon.co.uk/1cset0.htm

Solicitors' body comes to heel

- Times, 1nov01, p15

The solicitors' complaints body, which is accused today of failing to give the public crucial information about its members' track records, is to lose its idependent identity.

The Office for the Supervision of Solicitors (OSS), which receives 16,085 complaints a year, one for every five solicitors, is to be brought under the direct control of the Law Society of England and Wales.

The move comes as a Which? report says that the organisation's helpline is far from helpful and fails to tell people if their solicitor has been disciplined or struck off. "The OSS seemed reluctant or unable to give out the correct information," it said.

Solicitors under fire

Letter from Mr John Wilson, Times, 1nov01, p21

Sir, David Blunkett has angered solicitors by casting aspersions on their professional standards (report, oct29). For ten years I have been specialising in representing clients who have a complaint about a solicitor, so I know something about furious lawyers.

The lawyers are quite right in pointing out just the latest example of the executive branch not always

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

being entirely full-square with civil liberties. But they are hardly a shining beacon themselves.

Time and time again I have been consulted by a client who has been let down by a lawyer making the sort of elementary mistakes that any sane person would just own up to and refer to the insurance company, only to be met by the professional shutters slamming down.

In contrast to the frequent stories of doctors being exposed and unished for incompatence, lawyers seem to be immune from this sort of coverage. Mr Blunkett's outburst makes a pleasant change, but at what cost to our liberties?

Yours, John Wilson (Solicitor),

6a Rodney Lane, Leeds LS13 1HU

Solicitor jailed

- Times, 11dec01, p4

A solicitor with assets of more than £1 million stole £73,000 from a 91-year-old aunt to buy a luxury boat. David Benham, 59, of Southwark, London, who denied stealing from an account set aside to pay for nursing home fees, was jailed for six months by Winchester Crown Court.

Solicitors bring in Layman to see fair play

- Francis Gibb, Times, 25jan02, p6

The solicitors' complaints system, which handles 12,000 grievances a year, is to be overhaouled and placed under the scrutiny of a non-;awyer for the first time. .... in an effort to boost public confidence ....

The society has succeeded so far in seeing off ministerial threats that it be stripped if its self-regulatory powers. ....

Two years ago, .... complainants .... were told that they would have to wait a year before their grievances were dealt with., the Lord Chancellor threatened to remove the Law Society's power to regulate itself. ....

Bar for the course

Cambridge lecturer Gillian Evans has gone back to being a student on the Bar vocational course. She is unimpressed.

 - Guardian Education, 8jan02, p12

.... Students who are made to feel it would be unwise to use their critical faculties until after they are safely "called". A culture of toadying is actively fostered, for one must network to get the best pupillages. .... .... the depth of the institutionalised discrimination they practise. .... .... While winds of change at the Bar Council and the Law Society are stopped by draught-excluders of complacency and students' fear of professional disadvantage if they say what they think, all this will presumably go on. .... it needs to be run in a way that will produce barristers who will take a lead in the reform of the legal profession. ....

Lawrence sergeant cleared of rapes

- Sam Lister, Times, 11dec01, p4

Accusations of multiple rape against a police sergeant who was highly praised in the Stephen Lawrence murder inquiry were thrown out at the Old Bailey yesterday.

The trial of Peter Solley, accused of raping a woman on nine occasions, was stopped after Judge David Paget described the alleged victim's evidence as "manifestly unreliable". The woman said that Sergeant Solley, 47, had committed the rapes during a secret fuive-year relationship, but after three days of cross-examination the prosecution dropped all charges.

The .... woman, a black community worker, .... the defence, suggested that the woman made the accusations because Sergeant Solley had rejected her. ....

Sergeant Solley, from Beckenham, Kent, said: "I find it astonishing that the complainant can be shielded by anonymity, despite the finding that she is a proven liar."

Women should go it alone

- Jeremy Campbell,

Evening Standard, 4dec01, p20

A startling survey had found that women learn about one third less than men in college. Nearly 20,000 students at 56 colleges were interviewed, comparing scores on a standardised test. Gender was a "huge" factor, according to Professor Ernest Pascarella of the University of Iowa. Women fell behind most in maths and science. ....

Spouse

- Steve Doughty,

Daily Mail, 20july01

The Crown Prosecution Service has banned its 6,000 employees from using the word 'spouse'. In future, those working at the organisation responsible for bringing all criminal prosecutions will have to refer to 'partners' or 'friends' whenever they invite a colleague to a social event. Using the term 'spouse' assumes someone is married and leaves homosexuals feeling excluded, claimed a rulebook designed to eliminate discrimination.

Two days before

- Melanie Phillips,

Sunday Times, 9sep01, p17

.... Liberal values will be protected only if Christianity holds the line as our dominant culture. A society which professes neutrality between cultures would create a void which Islam, with its militant political creed, would attempt to fill. .... society is beginning to understand the need for truth-telling, family stability and distinctions between right and wrong, against all of which the Establishment has set its face. ....

Prisons

- Rechel Sylvester,

Telegraph, 17dec01, p12

HM Chief Inspector of Prisons, .... forced out of his job .... he was shocked to find staff in a mental ward had been falsifying suicide watch records. .... the Home Office is "a terrible place". .... the Home Office bureaucracy has "spiralled out of control". .... "Civil servants .... not used to putting things into practice .... Very few of our ministers have ever run anything, either - they're all professional politicians. ...."

Dworkin

"I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig." - Andrea Dworkin, leading feminist speaker, speaking through a character in her book Ice and Fire. Gloria Steinmen says of Andrea Dworkin; "In every century, there are a handful of writers who help the human race to evolve. Andrea is one of them". Quoted by Warren Farrell in his book; Women Can't Hear ...., pub. Tarcher/Putnam 1999, p179.

Recently, Dworkin co-authored a book with the other extremist Catherine MacKinnon, who played a part in drafting recent Canadian legislation.

".... rape, which by conservative definition happened to almost half of all women at least once in their lives." - C A MacKinnon, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State, pub. Harvard Univ. Press 1989, p142.

Do children come first?

- Cristina Odone, Observer, 20jan02, p23

.... a baby had been ditched at the roadside by his mama. .... the 24-year-old had already dumped an older child, whome she had left with her mother to raise. Charles, the three-month-old baby she left near the airport of Faro had a cleft lip and palate. .... Dismissing a life as if it were an uninvited guest; opting for instant gratification .... placing self above others - all deserve to be roundly condemned ....

Yet it is not. Or at least not by the liberal commentators .... 'It is not always easy being a parent,' proclaimed one headline, above a piece which went on to lay the blame for bad mothers like Penny squarely on - you guessed it - men. .... It allows women to regard motherhood as a project which entails no more commitment than a Berlitz course in French, which they can .... always drop out of.

.... an arena for competing rights .... she wins, hands down, every time .... lots of supporters .... will raise a wail of apologies on her behalf.

[I am mystified by the remark "the liberal commentators" being allowed in the Observer. For years, the Observer/Guardian stable has fronted a more vicious attack on the family and on men than anyone else. However, it seemed to wobble more than a year ago, when it allowed in Rabinovich even though she was under the influence of Oliver Cyriax. Perhaps Melanie Phillips could go back now! - Ed]

The Real Goal of Feminism: Transforming Society

- Antonia Feltz, 2/3/00

Speech delivered at the Inverell Forum.   At www.electromagnetism.demon.co.uk/THE REAL GOAL OF FEMINISM.htm

This is perhaps the definitive anslysis and indictment of what I call the Radfem Ideology, but Feltz would tend to make me call it Feminazi. Reading it had a powerful effect on me. Show it to your well-meaning women friends. - Ed

How fathers fit into the family

A fact sheet for secondary schools from CIVITAS which is in general agreement with ManKind. For example;

"Statistics about children who do not live with their fathers can be grim. On almost every outcome that has been tested, including educational achievement, self-esteem, responsible social behaviour, and adjustment as adults, children do better when they live with both parents."

See www.ivorcatt.com/2801.htm

CIVITAS, tel 020 7401 5471  www.civitas.org.uk

The cost of Radfem policies

Generally, Britain plans to follow NZ's expensive radfem policies, which our chairman said would bankrupt them..

Date: 08 January 2002 06:02

Dear Julian,

RE New Zealand,  navy cuts  and RW's prediction.

Do you recall the email exchange we had [two years ago] about New Zealand and its expenditure on social services and legal aid  ?

I said it would soon have to give up its defence capability and rely on Australia if it continued on its present path.

Well, it looks like that prediction is coming true.

The BBC reports, within the last 48 hours, that NZ is to give up most of its surface fleet.

I got it slightly wrong when I said that all they would be left with would be a few frigates. It seems that they're going to give those up and keep the supply ships instead.

And the airforce, of about 18 planes, is up for sale too.

Robert Whiston

Cohabitees to adopt children!

With or without children, only 4% of cohabitees stay together for more than 10 years. Source, Lynette Burrows, our conference speaker.

The right to life

Sadly, Afghan women have been deprived of their right to education, employment, and freedom of movement. At the same time, many thousands of Afghan men have been selectively targeted in a series of involuntary inscriptions, forced detentions, torture, and executions. As a result, many thousands of innocent men have lost the most precious right of all: the right to life.      [Full article at www.ivorcatt.com/2006.htm]

The Intervening Variable

Kaye Wellings et. al, Sexual Behaviour in Britain, pub. Penguin 1994, is the Gold Standard of statistics on the subject. Of particular interest is their figure for homosexual practice. pp183/5, find homosexuals number only around 1% of the population. (Ill Eagle 10, p2) Buggery is a tiny minority sport, as is even the desire to bugger.

The winter 01/02 issue no. 106 of the FYC Bulletin, p1, discusses the follow-up articles to the Wellings book, published in the Lancet of 1dec01 (vol. 358). Here we see interesting manipulation of facts for political ends. "The whole thrust of the article is immensely encouraging to the govt, .... the most important predictor of early motherhood is given as the educational level of the teenage girl. .... [also,] 'the factors most strongly associated with risk behaviour and adverse outcomes have considerable potential for preventive intervention'.

"Lurking in all these columns of figures is the uncomfortable fact of family structure. .... [the article] ignores the extent to which educational level and family structure are linked. [i.e. bad famly structure causes both teenage pregnancy and also bad educational outcome.] Anyone who thinks that standards in education can be raised irrespective of the home backgrounds of pupils obviously hasn't been in a school lately. Unless the govt's teenage pregnancy strategy is prepared to take family structure on board, the 'potential for preventive intervention' may be less than the authors of this study seem to think."

The last paragraph chillingly contrasts Wellings's statistic on people admitting to ten or more partners with the large number who had had no partner at all; ".... for many people, the breakdown of the family brought about by the sexual revolution has resulted in lives characterised by loneliness and sterility." FYC (Family & Youth Concern) is at www.famyouth.org.uk

Josephine Smith

Shot her husband as he slept. Convicted in 1993. Women's groups criticised the verdict. Has now been referred to the Court of Appeal. www.ivorcatt.com/2007.htm

More girls than boys shoplift

- John Steele, Telegraph, 5dec02

[21,000 men and 24,000 women] .... the growing predominance of schoolgirls .... was most worrying. .... some offenders came from troubled backgrounds but about 50% were from affluent families.

Prostate cancer and diet

.... if you have any specific questions relating to prostate cancer and diet, .... email diet@prostate-cancer.org.uk or ring 020 8222 7622

 

 

Editorial

Catch 22

Fiebert, available on my website www.electromagnetism.demon.co.uk and numerous other sources show us that domestic violence (DV) is initiated more often by women than by men. This creates a major problem when we discuss the issue with our female allies. They know that women are not violent.

Some years ago, I emphasised to Melanie Phillips and to Erin Pizzey that whenever they make the assertion, that women attack men more often than men attack women, they must add the caveat that there is very little violence started by anybody. Home Office Report No. 191, which gives violence from women as well as men at 4.2%, is a useful reference.

The assertion that women too are violent, made on its own, does not defend the traditional family. Quite the reverse. In contrast, if joined by the assertion that there is very little violence overall, it has a positive effect.

The anti-family axis which includes MacKinnon, Harman, Hewett, Dworkin, Stinko, Jay, Bindell, will be helped, rather than hindered, by assertions that women are violent as well. It is unwise to give them even more power, by helping their cause, which is to destroy the traditional family on the grounds that it is a dangerous place to be, as Stinko asserts.

We may diverge from some of our perceived allies on this matter. For instance, those who want to get funding for refuges for male victims may exaggerate the problem. What would be legitimate would be for them to assert that the problem of male victims equals that for female victims. Let us hope that they desist from any tendency to go beyond that. Mary Cleary of AMEN, who set up the first refuge for battered men, and who now receives funding from the Irish govt, does not overstep this mark.

The Domestic Violence Industry, which includes those who try to set up refuges for men, continually broadens the definition of Domestic Violence in order to increase their funding and their job security. Their definition, which is accepted by government, now includes "Financial Violence" - the withdrawal of money from one's spouse. It also includes shouting and also threat of violence. (Extraordinarily, when Stinko says that one quarter of women experience DV in the home, she is also saying that three quarters of women have never been shouted at!) Given this, it is of major importance that those who correctly say that men assault women no more less than women assault men, include discussion of their definitions in the same piece.

The issue is clouded by the fact of attacks by men on men. However, that is a completely different issue. The key to this is difference chivalry. Today it is completely overlooked, for good reason, that from the cradle boys are taught to never attack a woman, and they never do. The reason why this incessant training is ignored is that it clashes with radfem dogma, that men are trained to oppress women, for instance fathers sexually abusing their daughters in order to prepare them for oppression later on within marriage. The continuance of a heavy theme of chivalry in our society had to be overlooked if radfem dogma were to gain a hold, as it has. The continuing reign of chivalry means that women may attack women, men may attack men, women may attack men. Any attack by men on women is outlawed.

The reality, that men do not attack women, explains the increasing shrillness of such charges; for instance, the fantastic charge that men regularly kick pregnant women in the stomach. Since the whole thing is a lie, it may as well be further embroidered.

DV

- Dina Rabinovirch, Guardian, 26nov01, p6

.... Last year was not good for Pizzey: she was diagnosed with cancer, and her grandson, Kelta, a schizophrenic, committed suicide in a prison cell. .... she managed to have the case reheard - last month a jury .... found unanimously that his death was contributed to by the neglect of prison staff. .... a "legal landmark" ....

.... the statistic that every third day a woman in this country is beaten or killed by a current or ex-partner. When I repeat this to PIzzey, it causes her to grimace. She doesn't accept the thesis - that only men need to change their behaviour - or the figures.

"If you come from a dysfunctional, violent and sexually abusive family, how do you learn? Therefore, domestic violence can't be a gender issue, it can't be just men ...."

DV

"One in four women experience domestic violence at some stage in their lives"

Poisonous, socially destructive Stinko lies put out by the Church of England; www.oxford.anglican.org/docs/100189446124996.shtml

Dear Mr. Catt,    I request that you stop all communication with me. I find the letters you forward to me abusive and distressing. I am certain that your rmother and sister would be appalled if they knew that you were so unkind to people you have never met. Sincerely, Professor EA Stanko 20March 2000

ESRC defends Radfem 'research'

22jan02

Dear Mr. Catt, .... the complaint which you sent to us .... in which you claimed that Professor Betsy Stanko had falsified a (research) result, namely that 1 in 4 women experience Domestic Violence in the home. .... the source of the complaint was a publication entitled "Counting the Costs" .... published in 1998 by Crime Concern. .... I cannot find any grounds for supporting the view that the findings in the report are falsified. In fact the report is very careful in its methodology and the basis for its conclusion, and does so in transparent detail. There seems therefore to be absolutely no case for this to be seen as falsification and I cannot therefore accept your complaint. Yours sincerely, Chris Caswill, Director of Research, ESRC  chris.caswill@esrc

Full text at  www.ivorcatt.com/2004.htm

Gobbledeygook

Take care of the sounds, and the sense will take care of itself - Lewis Carroll

In Redbourn in the '60s, I went across the road to a further education lecture series by a gardener. Since he was a real gardener, his middle class audience listened in rapt silence. They admired The Common Man. However, I realised that the gardener, having heard lectures, and knowing what they sounded like, was actually making noises which sounded like a lecture, but which had no content. Fearing that my suppressed guffaws would offend my anxious neighbours, I never attended again.

Radfems, using the argument that rationality is part of patriarchal oppression, have taken over large swathes of academia and filled it with such gobbledeygook. A good example is of course Catherine MacKinnon, Toward a Feminiist Theory of the State, pub. Harvard UP 1989. I will quote a justification for such gobbledegook by two academics in England, Victoria Robinson and Diane Richardson; Introducing Women's Studies, pub. Macmillan 1993/7. On p2, Robinson writes;

"If a fundamental feature of Women's Studies is the simple yet radical belief in an approach to knowledge which places women at the centre of analysis (challenging an androcentric/phallocentric notion of knowledge which can be defined as men's experiences and priorities being seen as central and representative of all), then this realisation of a theoretical dishonesty has profound implications for how we organise, stucture, teach and research within the disciplines and the academy in general. This 'simple' shift in theorising and teaching recognises the politics of theory in terms of the so-called objuctivity of knowledge, which has failed to recognise and validate the diversity of experience of over half of mankind.

"Post-modern claims that to pursue a total theory is mistaken and essentialist, given that to do so inevitably means to generalise and universalise, have informed this feminist theorising."

Wow! The very idea that radfems do not generalise!

The undermining of academic precepts, by men like Feyerabend, pre-dates the radfems. Taking advantage of scientific treachery by F and others, we now see a full-scale, largely successful, radfem subvertion of the probity of academia.

The radfem fixation on the penis recurs (/phallocentric). Radfems, including lesbian radfems, think and talk about the penis far, far more often than men do.

How exams are fixed in favour of girls

The article with the above title by Dr Madsden Pirie from The Spectator, 20jan01, was printed in Ill Eagle 14, p8. I added a footnote;

The attack on Physics is gong on hand in hand with the attack on Maths. They are the two subjects I did at A level in 1953, gaining a State Scholarship to Cambridge. Because girls do better at Geography than at Physics, Physics has now been turned into a branch of Geography. It is particularly destructive to corrupt Physics by bringing ecology propaganda into it. True Physics is objective, value-free. - Ed

The future for Science

".... the oppressed may make better biologists, physicists, and philosophers than their oppressors. Thus we find the feminist theorist Hilary Rose saying that male scientists have been handicapped by being men. A better wcience would be based on women's domestic experience and practice. Professor Virginia Held offers hope that 'a feminist standpoint would give us a quite different understanding of even physical reality.' Conversely, those who are most socially favored, the proverbial white, middle-class males, are in the worst epistemic position." - Christina Hoff Sommers, Who stole feminism?, pub. Simon & Schuster 1994, p74.

The Black Hole: Women's Studies, Science and Technology

- Lynda Birke and Marsha Henry

From the book Introducing Women's Studies, ed. academics Victoria Robinson and Diane Richardson, pub. Macmillan 1993/97, pp 221 and 222

.... At the beginning of 'second-wave' feminism .... There was .... some hostility towards science within the women's movement, which sometimes collapsed into hostility towards women scientists ....  .... science .... is stereotypically associated with masculinity ....

One important strand  .... involves attempts to encourage women into science by various means, including changing the curriculum and its delivery. This has entailed, for example, developing 'girl friendly science' .... Challenging the content is, of course, rather more difficult. It is also rather threatening to many scientists, including many women scientists, and particularly so when feminists assert that science is masculine and needs to be changed. .... in 1985, one of us encountered hostility from a woman scientist in the audience: 'But if you succeed in changing it,' she agonised, 'it would no longer be science'. Indeed: it would no longer be the kind of science that so many of us have criticised. [Note that this is only in the 1997 edition, when boys had already fallen behind in 'science'! - Ed]

Feminization of Maths

My article with the above title in Male View oct98 referred to the article by Marian Chester Coombs in the journal Chronicles, oct97, p47, which discusses the attack on maths also taking place in the USA entitled Dumb and Number. ".... to cripple all, by making girls' 'learning style' mandatory for all. Mathematics .... is being neutered ...." Elsewhere, in Ill Eagle, I have said that Physics has been turned into a subset of Geography, because girls do better in Geography and boys in Physics. (Example; What are the similarities between our Moon and a certain planet of Jupiter? - GCSE Physics today. Next, perhaps boys will be learning the names of the rivers of Wales, because water flows downhill - a potential question in Physics which I learnt in Geography class in my Welsh school.)

We have now reached the stage where, as reported by the headline in the Telegraph, 12jan02, p1, "Girls win all the way from primary to university." The article says; "At both school and university, the gap between the sexes has widened as the nature of testing has changed.

"More emphasis has been put on coursework and continuous assessment, which reward steady application, and less on 'sudden death' exams, which are thought to favour boys."

The article misses altogether the removal from syllabi of content in which boys excel.

Now that girls are well ahead at all levels, even in maths, perhaps those who control education and have, at the behest of feminists, removed course material in which boys excel, might allow us to restore some parts at least of the doctored syllabus. Would women in general settle for mere sex equality in exam achievement? That would let us restore some key concepts in maths and physics. An example in A level Maths and Physics is the couple, or torque, which girls tend to have more trouble with. Another is angular momentum. A society which bans key concepts in the interests of equality puts itself at a disadvantage internationally.

Another factor is suicide. As the suicide rate among young men continues to escalate, their examination performance will deteriorate further. Someone contemplating suicide does not study so well. A reduction in the massive man-bashing in all the media would help here. It damages young men more than older, because the young have only ever experienced the current anti-male vituperation.

A good man is hard to find

- Eugen Hockenjos (honorary member of ManKind), Guardian, 20mar96, p2

Tommy is a quiet four-year-old living with his mother in Islington. He hasn't seen his father since mum left a relationship in which she felt abused. He likes playing with super-heroes. Since mum started a part-time job he gets looked after by a child minder who has a baby of her own. Next month he will start nursery. In Islington, 97 per cent of nursery staff are female. When he moves to primary school he will be welcomed by a teaching staff which, if it is anything like the national average, will be 80 per cent female. Should his mother have problems requiring help from the social services he will again see only women in the caring roles, as, similar to other local authorities, Islington's pool of social workers is 82 per cent female.

There is also little chance for Tommy to encounter a caring male during his contact with social services, as many of the male staff are allocated to deal with drug or alcohol-dependent clients, or those with HIV/Aids, and are often preoccupied with tasks considered too dangerous for Ilsington's women social workers. How will Tommy learn to care if he has no access to male role models? .... The absence of men in caring roles is escalating. ....

[Does the government introduce a policy aimed at restoring the proportion of men in teaching to 50%, as for the Commons, where the female representation is around 20 or 25%? Read on. - Ed]

IT must put gender on the agenda

- Rachel Fielding 18jan02

It's time for IT to put gender on the agenda. It may sound trite but that's the message from industry bodies and human resources executives from some of the world's largest IT recruiters.

Speaking at the Computer Software and Services Association (CSSA) conference to tackle the women in IT issue, Secretary of State for Trade and Industry Patricia Hewitt has called for greater collaboration between industry, government and education to tackle the issue head on.

"It is pathetic that fewer women are entering the IT industry than 20 years ago. The opportunities for industry and the economy in general are huge," she said.

Encouraging women to enter and stay in IT jobs is more than simply an altruistic ideal. It makes more business sense than ever, although getting that message through to the industry is proving a pretty hard nut to crack.

Ian Watmore, managing director of Accenture in the UK, said that equal representation and "equal perception" of his company by females was essential.

"It's not just a moral and ethical argument, it makes common sense," he explained. "By 2010 I will represent a minority - white, able bodied males. Eighty per cent of the growth market of the future will be women."

And although companies continue to complain about skills shortages in certain areas, the situation is compounded because they're recruiting from a pool that is half its potential size. Women represent over half of the potential workforce in this country, but only 22 per cent of the IT workforce.

The figure is more shocking as the number of IT jobs in the UK has grown by over 50 per cent in the last five years, with proportionally less women being recruited than before. As recently as 1994, women made up 29 per cent of IT employees, according to government figures.

"We need to do something at a grassroots level to change the image of the industry and share lessons about how some employers have succeeded in broadening their recruitment," said Anne Cantelo, project director at national training organisation e-skills NTO. The body has launched IT Compass, a website to attract individuals from non-IT backgrounds into the industry. ...

"We need an incentive structure to encourage all employers to invest in training and level out the playing field," he said Poodle-Man Lance Williams, human resources director at EDS.

A Barriers to women returning to IT report will be published by the Department of Trade and Industry on 21 January.

Schools are short of male staff, admits minister

- Rebecca Smithers, Guardian, 8jan02, p8

The govt yesterday admitted there was a worrying shortage of male role models in the classroom, after a Labour MP claimed that black boys were under-achieving because primary schools were dominated by women teachers.

The school standards minister .... admitted that .... more male role models were needed in schools.

The proportion of men entering primary teacher training courses is below the 15% target set for the teacher training agency. [A much smaller % than women MPs now in the Commons. Why not 50%? The implication that we need more women students because they will go part-time or withdraw, is surely matched by the fact that the attrition of male teachers as a result of false allegations will continue to rise. Is any effort being made to attract men to teaching by setting up procedures to give them better protection against false allegations?
Speak up, Patricia Hewett! Also note Baroness Margaret Jay, House of Lords, 20dec01, col. 392, arguing for increasing the number of women MPs above the present 18%; ".... unless we have [wo]men in public life [teaching] in much the same proportion as they are in the population .... rather higher than the 18% .... in the House of Commons at present - we lose [wo]men's distinctive perspective. There is a genuinely different women's perspective. Furthermore, we lose the different life and work experiences which [wo]men have and bring to the political [teaching] process." Also Baroness Seccombe, col. 386; ".... only 18% [of MPs] are women. It cannot be denied that that is a sorry state of affairs." Thus, the previously quoted "15% target set for the teacher training agency" is aiming to achieve a sorry state of affairs. - Ed]

Diane Abbott, MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington [bordering Islington], said black boys needed boundaries and strong direction from "male mentors" at an early age. [This directly contradicts the radfem anti-patriarchy propaganda that if boys are left in the hands of women, they will avoid learning macho behaviour, and be passive and sweet. - Ed]

She said primary schools had become a feminine domain and called on the education secretary, Estelle Morris, to recruit more teachers from the Caribbean. .... "There's nothing wrong [with white women] but the fact is when these black children come into school aged five, the are doing as well as white and Asian children. By age 16 their achievement has collapsed, particularly black boys. [she said the issue was] a silent catastrophe. ....

 

"Black children are six times more likely to be excluded than others. Children in care run 10 times the risk .... 42% of young offenders are former excludees." - Mary Riddell, Observer, 20jan02, p24

".... more than two-thirds of Afro-Caribbean families are .... single mother." - Eamon McMahon, Letter, Observer, 13jan02

From the Guardian, 31jan02; "Among the statistics contained in Social Trends is the frequency of mental illness among children. Around one in 10 adolescents had some form of mental disorder and children of lone parents were twice as likely to suffer mental health problems as those from "couple families". Mental illness is closely related to class. Only 5% of children of social class 1 families had such disorders, compared to 14% of children of social class 5.

Even more alarmingly, as many as 2% of children aged between 11 and 15 had tried to 'harm, hurt or kill themselves'."

Deadbeat dads: Victims?

- Laurence A. Elder, 30jan02

Full text at www.ivorcatt.com/2019.htm

 .... this angry response from an eighth-grade inner-city public school teacher:

"As an African-American public school educator in a school that serves an urban demographic, I'm intimately familiar to the genesis of these irresponsible fathers. There is little the government can do to help these men. They must first help themselves, and their communities must help them help themselves.

This year, 95 percent of the black boys I educate are failing my eighth-grade algebra class, despite all of them being at least as capable [if not more] than those that are passing. These 95 percent waste most of their class time, do little or no homework, are preoccupied with sports and girls, deride the 5 percent passing my class as "weak" or "soft," are consumed with wearing the latest "gear," only read when their teacher pleads, and laugh when they get Fs.

While I love them as intensely as I love my own son, I loathe their academic skills, attitude and commitment. I have no doubt the public school system has ruined them with years of inexperienced/uncommitted teachers who haven't demanded or expected the level of performance I have of them. Not surprisingly, none of these boys has a father at home (conversely, the 5 percent that are passing do). Very few of them are promising athletes, which, combined with their poor academic performance and social skills (many of the girls find them quite undesirable), you have the recipe for gang-bait. The help these young men need starts at home. ....

I take little pride in being the first black man they've known who a) went to college; b) doesn't smoke, do drugs or abuse alcohol; c) doesn't try to be a "playa"; d) consistently speaks standard English; e) doesn't have a criminal record. Black people must simply stop having children that cannot be responsibly reared, period. It's obvious to me why this issue is never emphasized by the social service advocates: You can't get government money for something most people should learn at home ..."

 

Tories target the causes of crime

- Philip Johnson, Telegraph, 9jan02

.... Oliver Letwin, shadow home secretary, .... focusing on social ills that fuel criminal behaviour - notably an absence of fathers from millions of broken homes. .... crime .... was particularly pronounced where there were a large number of broken homes. "Britain suffers from an epidemic of father absence," he said. "More than a fifth of our children now live without their fathers and, for half of these, contact is so infrequent that they are effectively fatherless." .... if a neighbourhood is allowed to go to rack and ruin crime will quickly take root. ....

Marriage works, so what is the point of a pale imitation?

- Oliver Letwin, Shadow Home Secretary, Telegraph, 25jan02, p28

.... The Civil Partnerships Bill .... provides us with the opportunity to restate sociaty's commitment to marriage and the special obligations and benefits that it entails. .... society particularly benefits from the fact that children brought up by married parents are more likely to have a stable background. .... children born to cohabiting couples are twice as likely to see their parents separate as children born within marriage.

The Conservative approach is based on outcomes - it does not stem from dogma, or from a particular set of religious values. .... politicians .... should leave well alone when they encounter long-standing institutions .... We must build on success. We must do noting to undermine the institution of marriage.

That is why the Civil Partnerships Bill does not merit support. It provides rights .... that are already available to couples through marriage.....

Providing a watered-down variant of marriage would serve only to undermine the institution, and increase the risk of the state intruding into people's lives in order to discover whether the extent of their cohabitation justifies the rights that they would claim. .... the state should intrude less into people's lives. This principle is more likely to be upheld if we keep faith with institutions, such as marriage, that are the bulwark against state interference. Marriage is clear cut, whereas weaker alrternatives would involve the state inquiring into the length or type of people's relationships: an increase in intrusion into our lives. ....

Marriage, which has proved itself to be a force for good, must remain one of our essential foundations.

[Full article is at www.ivorcatt.com/2005.htm ]

 

 

Megaphone Diplomacy

- Mathew Mudge,  29jan02

Dear All,

As planned, on Friday 25th January 2002 from 18:30 to 20:15, between 35 and 40 Equal Parenting Coalition demonstrators manned a peaceful but very vocal picket outside the Severnshed Restaurant in The Grove, Bristol. The occasion was the annual dinner of the Bristol Solicitors Family Law Association and marked the first demonstrating event of 2002.

The weather was less than helpful being somewhat windy and wet but did not prevent the generation of a warm reception for those attending the dinner. Many colourful placards were evident as well as the new EPC handouts bearing the new logo (big thanks to Matt OConnor).

Our new megaphone (courtesy of Spike and Julie) was put to good use (after some initial teething trouble getting the batteries in the right way !) and the diners were left in no doubt about our reason for being there. Sheepish looks were the order of the evening, made only worse by the courtesy of the protesters. Anson Allen had to be seen to be believed sporting a shirt (with a collar !), bow tie and bowler hat, Anson provided a doorman service (with umbrella) for those being dropped off at the restaurant door. Bolder souls parked further up the street and walked past us, braving the presence of fathers, mothers, aunts, uncles, grandparents, family friends and supporters.

The demo was covered by a reporter and press photographer from the Bristol Evening Post and Anson is liaising with them about press releases etc. One new record to note a great grandmother had braved the elements and travelled all the way from Cardiff for the event.

Anyone know the details of the Great Grandparents Federation ?

May I publicly thank all those who attended, several who did not quite make it due to traffic hold-ups, and those who telephoned their support during the protest. Our thanks too for the patience and understanding demonstrated by the staff of the Severnshed Restaurant who took it all with grace and in good humour.

It would be remiss of me not to thank the van full of local constabulary officers who were present throughout. I introduced myself to them at the beginning of the evening and made sure they knew we were not there to cause trouble. One officer thanked me for my trouble and pointed out to me that he recognised me from the Bath demo where he had been on duty too. The officer asked for leaflets for one of his colleagues in the back of the van who was experiencing the same difficulties in his private life and quantities of leaflets, posters and membership forms were handed over.

To conclude, I am in no doubt about the effectiveness of targeting such events for action and judging by the many favourable comments received on the night from by-passers, bus, van and lorry drivers (and even from some of those attending the dinner), we are succeeding in our aims of raising public awareness and generating public sympathy for the plight of our children. Now is not the time to relax.

Even a year ago, we would have all been delighted to have a crowd of 40 people attend a demo in the middle of summer. To do so in January on an evening of quite dreadful weather indicates how far we have come in such a short time.

Our children now need us to convert this number from tens into hundreds and then thousands. Many more events are being planned and absolute support and commitment is now vital. I am not writing this for the regular attendees quite rightly I could be accused of preaching to the converted. We must now encourage and motivate all those who have yet to support a demo to do so. I have yet to meet the person who attends only 1 demo and then walks away EVERYONE who comes once will be made welcome and I'm sure, will wish to keep coming.

That's all for now watch for details of the next demo. Kind regards and best wishes to everyone; Matthew Mudge, Cardiff. Also see www.ivorcatt.com/2013.htm

Sunday fathers: their untold story

- Maureen Freely,

Marie Claire dec01

.... Above all, we must resist the tendency to use children as weapons in a continuing battle against another partner or another adult. .... 40% of fathers lose contact with their children within two years of separation or divorce. This is a famous statistic and is usually read at meaning 40% of post-divorce dads are either deadbeats - who don't want to know or pay for their children - or beyond the pale in some other way. They must have histories of abuse, neglect or violence, people assume.

However, it is beginning to emerge that a large number of these fathers are unjustifiably stereotyped. Hiding inside this shadowy 40% are hundreds of thousands of ordinary men who have been barred from seeing their children and often for reasons that would be deemed sexist if applied to women.

.... the Children Act, for all its fine words about shared parenting, gives non-resident parents - usually the father - only one right: the right to apply to a court to see their child.

However, this is rarely made explicit. As one father told me, 'No one tells you anything. You go to a solicitor, who tells you nothing .... .... the court reporter decided his two girls did not want to see him because that's what they said in an interview conducted in the presence of the mother. When this father asked why the family court reporter hadn't spoken to the girls alone, she said, 'Actually, I was thinking of taking them for a walk, but it was raining.' When he asked if she might have made a different decision if it had been sunny and she had taken the girls for that walk, she replied, 'Yes, I probably would have done.' But by then it was too late to undo the damage.

.... a court reporter can make any recommendations for any reason. There is no established way for her to make sure she's not unduly influenced by any personal views she might have about what is 'right' for a child. Due to added pressure of work, she is often obliged to arrive at her decisions quickly. There is no set form she must follow. There's not even a requirement that she ascertains the wishes of the children in a safe place where neither parent can pressurise them.

In one case, the court reporter cold find no reason why a child shouldn't see more of his father. She went on to say that, 'Nonetheless, the mother must be concerned about something', and advised that his contact be limited to two hours, once every six weeks. Another father with no signs of abnormality had to undergo three medical/psychological exams on the recommendation of a court reporter to prove he was normal. When the results were judged to be inconclusive because he only 'appeared normal', his application to see his children was denied. ....

Unfortunately, it is impossible to report on the precise nature of these cases as judgements are confidential. Not even the judiciary knows what the overall picture is. The can't even see if different judges or courts have different types of outcomes. There has been no effort to collate data on the first 1 million cases that have gone through the system. Everyone is in the dark.

But it would appear that the court's standard solution in contact cases is to support the parent it perceives as the primary carer and to marginalise the other. And there's a pretty solid consensus now among professionals that this isn't always good news for the children. ....

The Coalition for Equal Parenting, which includes mothers' as well as fathers' groups, would like a system in which it is much more difficult for one parent to make false allegations against the other. ....

 

[We shall be meeting more and more triumphalism, see below, since today an employer needs to avoid employing white males in order to steer clear of equality and sexist legislation. - Ed]

"Goodbye Boys"

- Maggie Brown, Radio

Times 12jan02, cover and p39

Meet the women who are taking over the news. ....

In announcing the appointment of [Kirsty] Young, Kevin Lygo, Channel 5's director of programmes, believes that he has found the answer. "The main news programmes have all been presented by men in their fifities and upwards, .... To have an intelligent, attractive, talented professional woman at the centre of our news and our channel is equally important. It is positioning the channel in keeping with what we are. She is a modern woman, a working mother: she personifies the values we aant to be associated with." ....

Attwell, 50, tuns the news content of BBC News 24, BBC World and services on BBC3 and BBC4. She recently watched a boxful of tapes from young hopefuls: 15 women, just two men. "I can't tell you the trouble I've had finding male presenters - ones of quality, able to cope with anything. They are really thin on the ground. ...."

So why are good male presenters so hard to find? "I don't know ...."

[Have young white males finally got the message, that a TV channel must use a non-white or a woman as front man in order to fend off Employment Tribunals, the Equal Opportunities Commission and the Race Relations Board. With a PC frontage, the TV company may get away with employing a few white males with technical skills in the background. - Ed]

The baby war

- Tessa Boase dares to be politically incorrect - Sunday Times News Review, 11nov01, p1

.... Supermums. But many childless women secretly call them an absolute pain. Is motherhood compatible with work?

.... I get no benefits equal to family pension or healthcare plans. .... none-parents are being cheated .... the "new found fury of the childless".

Largely missing from the debate is the question of whether couples become parents as a matter of absolute choice or whether they are meeting the needs of society, which should consequently take collective responsibility for children. ...."They're continuing the human race, for God's sake, ...."

What men earn will be revealed to women

- Sarah Womack, Telegraph, 6dec01, p4

Women will have the right to know how much male colleagues doing similar work are paid, the Govt announced yesterday.

Companies who refuse the information could be taken to an employment tribunal. The move is aimed at closing the 18 per cent pay gap between men and women in similar full-time jobs.

Patricia Hewitt, the Trade and Industry Secretary, said the employment law changes would not solve the problem of unequal pay overnight.

"A cultural change among employers to value women's contribution to business success properly was also needed," she said.

She wanted women to test an employer's equal pay policy by obtaining information about wages and job grades.

Too many women were becoming "detached" from well-paid jobs by motherhood, she said.

Mrs Hewett made her announcement in response to a report by Denise Kingsmill, the Govt's adviser on equal pay, which said employers' attitudes to equal employment and pay should be open to public scrutiny.

Firms were urged to launch pay reviews to make sure women staff were not being paid less than men.

Larger companies will have to publish details of how they train and recruit staff.

Thirty years after the Equal Pay Act, women are still getting paid less than men, resulting in a deficit that could add up to as much as £250,000 over a lifetime.

On average, for every £1 a man earns, a woman gets only 82p over both the public and private sectors.

In the banking and insurance sector, male pay averages approximately £18 per hour. Women receive just under £10.50.

[But see P Hewett and P Leach, Social Justice, Children and Families, pub. IPPR 1993, p iv;

"....The pay gap between women and men is largely a result of family responsibilities. The earnings of single childless women, on average, are over 95% of those of single, childless men: but married mothers earn, on average, only 60% of the pay of married fathers."

She has to avoid the significance of her own figures. She is using the failure of married mothers to earn much, to raise the pay of single women above that of single men. That will make young men even more unmarriageable, and accelerate the drop in the marriage rate and the birth rate, both already at crisis level, because women and men will pay an increasing penalty if they marry.

The missing statistic in the Hewett book is that single men, single women and married women all earn about the same (see Gilder), while Married men earn 70% more than all the others. However, there is enough information in the Hewett book to show that the present Hewett initiative is undertaken by an anti-social shyster bent on destroying the family, or else by a stupid woman.

Harman's 1993 book The Century Gap, p123, says;  "Young men and women with comparable qualifications but who are not parents earn much the same as each other. When men become fathers their earnings are unaffected or increase; when women become mothers their earnings drop...." Harman, along with radfems in general, is immune to statistics, so her confirmation that singles earn the same is of limited value, but worth mentioning to show the hypocrisy extends beyond Hewett to the full coterie surounding Blair. - Ed]

Worms are crushed by a feminazi boot

- letter from Andrew Schofield, Telegraph, 8dec01

Some years ago, The Two Ronnies conjured up a vision of Stalinist feminism in a sketch called "The Worm that Turned". I never thought I would live to see it become a reality. Yet the announcement by Patricia Hewett that female employees are to enjoy the right to confidential salary information about their male colleagues (report, Dec.6), I believe I might.

It remains to be seen whether the courts uphold reciprocal rights for men. What is truly disturbing, and should worry women as much as men, is what it reveals of a government terrorised by political correctness and in thrall to a "feminazi" clique.

A series of bone-headed initiatives in the area of employment law is already in danger of diminishing the achievements of successful women. European and govt money funds sexually exclusive training centres, while bounties are offered to employers to hire female engineers and scientists.

The Equal Opportunities Commission is now seeking the right of automatic promotion for women, with the burden of proof shifted to employers to prove inadequacy or incompetence.

What next in the gender jihad? Men's health is already comprehensively neglected, in spite of reliable new screening methods for the scourge of prostate cancer. Men are routinely asset stripped in the courts without regard to the conduct of a former spouse. But overpromoted women present the thorniest problem of all, for the respect of peers is a matter of private conscience. Patricia Hewett, Harried Harperson and Labour's other unreconstructed feminists may have to consider an oriental mode of ritual obeisance. It could be the only way to keep this cruel and capricious show on the road.

- Andrew Schofield, Cambridge

Reality

Control of the media by radfems prevents the public from knowing that the denial of basic human rights to fathers is routine. The hidden agenda is the belief, fostered by Stinko of RHC, who is funded by the Home Office to fabricate false statistics, that the main threat to a child is its own father; that the reason why a father wishes to access his child is in order batter it or else to sexually molest it. This letter is one of many. - Ed

Dear Ivor, Thanks for sending me the extracts on the DV research and the goings on at RHC.

I sent copies on to my MP FD, pointing out that the Melanie Phillips quote - of lies about men being accepted as truth - was nowhere better adopted in vicious anti-male style than by our own A City Council, who despite knowing I have 'equal parental rights' AND a court order to see my son, supply my ex with 3 nights a week social work carers, babysitting whilst I pace the streets totally unable even to see my 6 year old. This is naked us of social work for political ends and the thin end of an ugly wedge. Social services being used to facilitate the exclusion of a man from his children and refusing even to discuss the matter.

Like many I am a not-too-proud-of-it member of FNF .... I very much appreciate the stance of the publications and hope I can be of some small help ....

All of the best,          PH.

When ignorance is not bliss for the rest of us

I just do not understand why I know more about the law than all the salaried judges, relevant journalists and relevant Cabinet Ministers put together. Do none of them operate their brains when addressing legal matters?

"Ministers' revolt saves trial by jury. - Francis Gibb, Times, 21jan02, p1.

"Plans to scrap the right to trial by jury for many offences are to be abandoned in the face of strong opposition led by prominent members of the Cabinet. .... One option would be to implement Sir Robin's proposal for a formalised system of plea-bargaining, increasing incentives for defendants to plead guilty before magistrates. Conviction in the Crown Court would result in heavier punishment. ...."

Plea-bargaining increases the conviction rate, and will always be exploited by the police. Even after the end of Thatcher, their promotion will still be linked to their conviction rate. However, the most insidious factor, which none of these highly salaried people link in, is parole.

I am in correspondence with many falsely imprisoned prisoners who refuse to admit to a crime they did not commit, and so serve their full sentence rather than only half. I set out to organise a "crossed fingers behind your back" "confession", so that the prisoner could proceed to sue all the rogues to framed him, even after "admitting" the crime so as to get out of prison and back home earlier. (My friend, the wife-murderer Charles Hanson, see Ill Eagle 10, p4, www.ivorcatt.2000.htm whose help I needed, refused to help, so I gave up.) I think particularly of a policeman framed on a rape charge and still in prison in Northern Ireland, who finally, after some years, succumbed and falsely admitted guilt so as to get back to his wife and children two years earlier. (He tells me that he now faces listening to courses run by virulent radfems, which he finds extremely upsetting, on how to not rape again.) It seems that none of the judges, politicians and journalists have the motivation to think these matters through, although it is easy to do so. Another man, Koupparis, who was framed and sentenced to four years, discussed in my book The Hook and the Sting, on my old website www.electromagnetism.demon.co.uk, told me he served his full term so that afterwards he would still be able to sue for wrongful imprisonment. These cases are all around us, but not around politicians, judges and journalists.

What is so terrifying is that a highly intelligent woman friend of mine stuck to the disastrous idea that admission of guilt has to remain the first atep in the rehabilitation process, even though she was familiar the way all the lawyers and juddges in my divorce case welcomed perjury, and knew that it was rampant in the courts. So it is not only politicians, judges and journalists who refuse to use their brains when addressing these terribly important matters.

A legal and criminal system run by people whose only interest is their golf handicap is threat to every one of us. - Ed

False result fear over DNA tests

- Nick Paton Walsh,

Observer, 27jan02, p11

One in every hundred forensic tests performed on the DNA of suspected criminals may give a false result, according to the first research of its kind into laboratory error rates. .... DNA testing is widely used to convince juries of a suspect's guilt or presence at the scene of a crime, and was thought to be almost flawless.

The findings will shock British DNA laboratories, which deny that errors exist. .... the first accuracy tests carried out on DNA laboratories [in Texas] .... calculated .... error had occurred in 12 in every 1,000 tests. ....

Charles Hanson

W1638 Charles Hanson

H M Prison Kingston

Milton Rd., Portsmouth

PO3 6AS

25jan02

Dear Ivor,

I regret that you do not see the way that all those prisoners who profess their so called innocence see things.

First let me say that I have met many many prisoners who tell you that they are innocent, in fact so many that all the innocent people must be in prison which suggests that the outside world is perhaps the more dangerous than I thought and perhaps prison is after all the safest place to be.

I have personally known those that have steadfastly maintained their innocence who would NEVER dream of admitting any guilt for short term gains like that clown in Northern Ireland. Stephen Dowling the lifer who was released last year after 27 years and was recently cleared by the Court of Appeal would have been released years ago had he admitted his guilt, as it was he was 10 years over his tariff when he was finally granted bail to await the outcome of his appeal which was a foregone conclusion, he too had a family and loved ones as did the Birmingham 6, the Guildford 4, Judith Ward, Stefan Kisvko, Andy Evans (did 21 years) and others.

NONE admitted their guilt, all were lifers and all had loved ones.

These weren't