Ivor Catt,
121 Westfields,
St. Albans AL3 4JR
20 August 2010
Michael Bottomley,
Ewart Price Solicitors,
1st Floor
16-18 Church Road,
Welwyn
Garden City,
Herts AL8 6PS
Your ref.
MBB/HAD/c010885.001
Dear Mr. Bottomley,
Thank you for
your letter dated 16 August 2010.
Before
taking legal advice, your client should have responded to my assertion on 3
August that "the final report of the assessment" totally
contradicted "my scores in the medical test in the office
(Cognitive Testing Marking Sheet)". I wrote; "The effect of this
total contradiction has been very damaging. Please look into it." She
should have had this done, and the conclusions reported to me.
You client
should show how the two can be reconciled now, before coming to court. As you
know, the court does not look kindly on ambush.
Yours
faithfully,
Ivor Catt
-----
Original Message -----
From: Ivor Catt
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 5:18 PM
Subject: To HAD Chief Executive Annabelle
Waterfield
cc Shirley Mead
please.
Dear
Annabelle Waterfield,
I have now
(dated 2 Auguast 2010) received from your Shirley Mead "my
scores in the medical test in the office (Cognitive Testing Marking
Sheet)". These totally contradict "the final report of the
assessment" in an extreme way. (My high scores are even higher than
the examiner calculated, giving 84 when you can see that the correct addition
is 86, or 100%)
The effect
of this total contradiction has been very damaging. Please look into it.
I shall put
an analysis of the sitation on my website in the near
future. This is just an initial, immediate letter.
Ivor Catt
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x.htm
01727 864257
"the final report of the assessment"
"cognitive section"
"DRIVING
ASSESSMENT REPORT
....
COGNITIVE
AND PERCEPTUAL ASSESSMENT ....
Speech and
Language: Satisfactory
Memory:
Satisfactory
Reasoning
Ability: Significant Deficit Noted
Concentration/Attention:
Significant Deficit Noted
Behaviour:
Extremely Inappropriate